Skip to main content

Trade Forex Online

Account
Leverage

Spreads
As Low As

Bonus
Offerings

Fee on
Deposits

Since 2011
12 Years

Regulated & Trusted Broker

FB Signature's

Innovative Trading

Why Choose Imc International

Reasons Why WorldWide Traders Trust Imc International

Global Presence Since 2011

125+ Countries Happy Traders

Personal Account Managers

For Continous Customer Support

Five Asset Classes

Wide Range of Financial Instruments

Segregated Funds

Segregated Client Accounts With Top Liquidity Providers

Multiple Account Types

Choose Your Account as per Your Trading Style

24/5 Live Customer Support

Professional Support Staff for all Queries

META TRADER 5

World's Most Favourite Trading Platform

Download MT5

POPULAR MARKETS

Symbol Bid Ask Spread
EUR/USD 109.300 109.311 1.1
GBP/USD 109.300 109.311 1.1
USD/JPY 1.28109 1.28120 1.1
AUD/USD 0.96329 0.96344 1.5
EURCHF 1.25335 1.25356 2.1
EUR/GBP 0.78958 0.78973 1.5
EUR/GBP 0.78958 0.78973 1.5
Symbol Bid Ask Spread
USD/JPY 1.28109 1.28120 1.1
AUD/USD 0.96329 0.96344 1.5
EURCHF 1.25335 1.25356 2.1
EUR/GBP 0.78958 0.78973 1.5
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
Symbol Bid Ask Spread
EURCHF 1.25335 1.25356 2.1
EUR/GBP 0.78958 0.78973 1.5
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
Symbol Bid Ask Spread
EUR/GBP 0.78958 0.78973 1.5
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
Symbol Bid Ask Spread
EURCHF 1.25335 1.25356 2.1
EUR/GBP 0.78958 0.78973 1.5
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8
EUR/JPY 0.78958 0.78973 1.8

50$

Welcome Bonus

3$

Cash Back

50%

Deposit Bonus

FB Copy Trading

Simple & Fast Account Opening & Funding

Just few minutes to get your account set up and ready for trading

  • France is having its Liz Truss moment as the bond market forces a policy rethink. Why it's a good thing.
    by Giuseppe Dellamotta on October 6, 2026 at 8:48 am

    France's bond market recently sent a strong message to policymakers. The spread between French and German 10-year government bonds surged above 150 basis points last week, reaching its widest level since the euro-area debt crisis. French borrowing costs approached 5%, while concerns over the country's deficit, debt trajectory and political fragmentation intensified ahead of the 2027 presidential election.The market reaction is important because it can create a feedback loop. Higher bond yields increase the government's interest bill, which worsens the fiscal outlook, requiring even more borrowing and potentially pushing investors to demand an even larger risk premium. But there is also a good side as the bond market can force policymakers to change cours.Chart: OAT-Bund spread Governments ultimately need investors to finance their deficits. As long as investors are comfortable buying government debt, policymakers have considerable room to pursue their preferred fiscal policies. But that changes when borrowing costs rise sharply.If investors are willing to finance France at 3%, a large deficit may be politically manageable. If the market suddenly demands 5%, the cost of servicing that debt becomes much more significant. France's interest bill is already projected to rise sharply, reaching around €91 billion in 2027 under the government's current budget assumptions.At that point, bond market pricing starts feeding directly back into fiscal policy. Fiscal concerns lead to a rise in bond yields and interest costs, and eventually to a deterioration in fiscal outlook and political pressure to consolidate. The market pricing itself can become one of the forces determining future government policy.The Liz Truss exampleThe clearest example is the United Kingdom in 2022. The government of Liz Truss announced a large package of tax cuts without corresponding spending reductions. Investors immediately questioned the credibility of the fiscal plan. UK government bond yields surged dramatically, with the 30-year gilt yield rising around 120 basis points between September 22 and September 27 alone, far more than comparable moves in US and German bonds.The selloff eventually became a financial stability problem because leveraged liability-driven investment funds were struggling with the rapid repricing of gilts. The Bank of England intervened to restore market functioning. The political response followed soon after.The government progressively abandoned the original fiscal programme, with most of the remaining tax cuts eventually scrapped. The combination of fiscal U-turns and the stabilisation of the gilt market reversed much of the extreme move in yields. Markets can place limits on fiscal policy that governments discover only after testing them.France is different, but the mechanism is similarFrance's episode is different but the final result might be similar. France's problem has accumulated over time. Public debt has reached roughly 119% of GDP, while the government expects a deficit of 5.4% of GDP in 2026. Its 2027 budget proposes €43 billion of new measures, taking the total fiscal effort affecting next year's accounts to around €54 billion, with a target of reducing the deficit to 5% of GDP.Even that effort would not stabilise the debt ratio. The government's own projections see public debt rising to around 121.7% of GDP in 2027. This is where the bond market becomes important. The French government needs to convince investors that the debt trajectory can eventually be stabilised, while simultaneously convincing parliament that the required fiscal consolidation is politically acceptable. Those two objectives are difficult to reconcile.The recent surge in OAT yields therefore increases the pressure on politicians to find a compromise. The government has already emphasised the need for significant savings, while opposition parties are being forced to consider the market consequences of preventing the budget from passing.And there are signs that the bond-market crisis is affecting the political debate more broadly. Marine Le Pen is now preparing a plan centred on €25 billion of annual spending reductions, explicitly seeking to demonstrate fiscal credibility as French borrowing costs surge. That is an important development because it shows how market pricing can begin to change the political incentives of the actors who will ultimately determine fiscal policy.The bond market doesn't need a full U-turnMarkets do not necessarily need France to announce a dramatic fiscal reversal like the UK did in 2022. They may simply need evidence that policymakers have understood the constraint and are taking credible measures to fix the problem. The market might just need a compromise on the 2027 budget, spending reductions and political agreement that makes the budget process more predictable. The market could then conclude that the probability of a much worse fiscal outcome has fallen and that alone could cause the risk premium to decline, leading to a tightening in OAT-Bund spread and improving risk sentiment. Something similar happened with Trump's Liberation Day in April 2025. The sharp increase in Treasury yields forced Trump to pause and ease his aggressive reciprocal tariffs. He did confirm later that the he didn't like the reaction in the bond market. The markets eventually rebounded strongly just because of a less agressive stance that improved future expectations. In extreme cases, the markets can force policymakers to change course.Potential tradesThe recent "mini-crisis" in the OAT-Bund spread might have reached a peak as policymakers started to take the problem very seriously. We've been seeing some steady tightening in the spread since Friday, which could be an early signal of a reversal. The euro and the CAC40 have been tightly correlated with the OAT-Bund spread since early September. The catalyst might have been the break of the 2024 high, which eventually led to a quick surge.Chart: OAT-Bund spread (candles) vs EUR/USD (blue line - inverted) and CAC40 (purple line - inverted)This morning French policymakers have doubled down on their committment to fix the problem and we've been seeing an acceleration in the spread tightening. This is leading to a rally in the euro and the CAC40. We could be in the early innings of a recovery... This article was written by Giuseppe Dellamotta at investinglive.com.

  • Macro pulse: France-Germany yield spread breakout puts euro area contagion risk in focus
    by Justin Low on October 6, 2026 at 7:57 am

    With all that is happening in markets, there are plenty of charts worth watching in Europe right now. However, this in particular may be one of the most important.The gap between French and German 10-year bond yields has surged over the past month, as investors are demanding a much bigger premium for holding French government debt over German bunds. The move looks even more striking when you zoom out on the charts.The yield spread has decisively broken above the roughly 80 bps area that had capped it over the past couple of years. And even after pulling back from above 150 bps last week, it is still sitting around 135 bps currently. For some context, those are levels last associated with the euro area sovereign debt crisis around 2012.That alone tells us how dramatically markets have repriced French fiscal risk in recent weeks.Investors remain extremely uneasy over France's fiscal trajectory. The government's proposed 2027 budget, which includes around €43 billion in savings, still has to go through a deeply divided parliament ahead of next year's presidential election.Now, if the French-German yield spread stays elevated but other euro area spreads remain relatively contained, then this is very much a story that revolves around French fiscal repricing.But if those other spreads start widening alongside it, then the conversation starts shifting from French fiscal risk towards broader euro area stress.That is not to say that we haven't seen some hints of that pressure already. The euro had fallen to a 17-month low against the dollar yesterday, with traders starting to question if France's problems could spill over into the wider region.Besides that, other European bond markets are also under strain and keeping on edge in the meantime. The spread between Italian and German 10-year bond yields has also widened to nearly 125 bps last week, before narrowing to around 110 bps now. That is still considerably higher from around 80 bps at the start of September, with the current spread being the widest in nearly 18 months.With that in mind, I would argue that perhaps the market focus should not be too much on whether the French-German yield spread is 130, 140 or 150 bps on any particular day. Instead, the focus should really be more about the breadth of the move.To put things more simply, France selling off on its own is largely a French fiscal problem. But France selling off while risk premiums rise across Europe, then that really starts becoming more of a euro area problem. This article was written by Justin Low at investinglive.com.

  • Solana launches open settlement standard for institutions, with JPMorgan input
    by Eamonn Sheridan on October 6, 2026 at 3:01 am

    Solana launches open settlement standard for institutions: what JPMorgan's role actually meansThe Solana Foundation has launched Solana DvP, an open-source program designed to let banks and other financial institutions settle trades of tokenised assets on the Solana blockchain in a single step. The foundation announced it in New York on Monday, 5 October, and said JPMorgan provided input on institutional settlement practices during development.The headline link to JPMorgan is the part readers should look at most carefully. The program is new and potentially useful, but it is not yet evidence that big banks are moving trades onto Solana.What happenedSolana DvP is an escrow program released under the MIT licence, which means anyone can use, adapt and build on it without paying licensing fees. It gives institutions a standard way to carry out delivery-versus-payment, or DvP, settlement on Solana.DvP is the basic safeguard of securities markets: the asset and the cash change hands at the same time, or the trade does not happen at all. That removes the risk of one side paying and the other failing to deliver. In traditional markets this runs through clearing houses, depositories and custodians, and typically takes one to two days. The foundation says its program does it in one atomic transaction, with finality in seconds.The program supports Solana's standard token formats, including Token-2022 features that regulated issuers rely on, such as the ability to pause a token or restrict transfers. Any two counterparties can use it with any settlement agent, such as a bank, custodian or exchange. The foundation says it has passed external security audits and plans to add privacy features so settlement details can stay confidential. It is inviting design partners and early participants ahead of a full production release.Why it mattersUntil now, institutions settling on-chain have typically relied on custom smart contracts built for each deal. A shared open standard could lower that cost and make tokenised securities easier to trade between firms that have not built their own tooling.There is a precedent. In December 2025, JPMorgan arranged a US$50 million tokenised commercial paper issuance for Galaxy Digital on Solana, bought by Coinbase and Franklin Templeton, and handled the DvP settlement itself. Solana DvP effectively turns that kind of bespoke settlement into reusable public infrastructure.The headline versus the commitmentRhodel D'souza, Head of Markets Digital Assets at JPMorgan, said a shared open standard for atomic settlement is the kind of foundational infrastructure institutional participants need, and that the bank was pleased to contribute its expertise.However, the press release includes a JPMorgan disclaimer stating that the bank's involvement was limited to advice on settlement practices. It says this should not be read as JPMorgan designing, operating, approving or endorsing the program. JPMorgan has not said it will settle trades through Solana DvP. What has changed is that a standard now exists. Adoption has not yet been demonstrated.What to watch nextThe clearest signal will be the first named bank, asset manager or custodian to settle a live trade using Solana DvP, and whether repeat users follow. The promised privacy features also matter, since institutions are often reluctant to expose trade details on a public chain.What would weaken the story is a long gap with no named adopters, or institutions continuing to favour private networks or rival chains for tokenised settlement. Readers watching SOL should treat this as a long-term infrastructure development rather than a near-term price catalyst. Infrastructure announcements show where a network is heading, but usage is what confirms it.Key termsAtomic settlement A transaction where every part either completes together or none of it does. In a trade, the buyer can't end up paying without receiving the asset, or the reverse.Finality The point at which a transaction can no longer be reversed or changed. On Solana this takes seconds. Traditional securities settlement usually takes one to two days.Counterparty risk The risk that the other side of a trade fails to deliver what it promised, whether that is the asset or the payment.Tokenised assets Traditional financial assets, such as bonds or commercial paper, represented as digital tokens on a blockchain so they can be held and transferred there.Commercial paper Short-term debt that companies issue to raise cash, usually repaid within months rather than years.Escrow program Code on the blockchain that holds both sides of a trade and releases them only when agreed conditions are met, such as both parties delivering before a deadline.Open source (MIT licence) The code is publicly available, and anyone can use, change or build on it for free, including for commercial purposes.Settlement agent The firm that oversees the exchange of asset and payment in a trade, such as a bank, custodian or exchange.Token-2022 Solana's upgraded token standard. It lets issuers build controls directly into a token, such as pausing transfers or restricting who can hold it, which regulated issuers need. This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.

  • ICYMI: Citi raises bitcoin target to $113,000 and ether to $3,028 as crypto inflows return
    by Eamonn Sheridan on October 6, 2026 at 2:46 am

    Citi's upgrade adds tier-one support to the recovery in crypto, which may encourage institutional buyers who have held back since bitcoin's slide from its record high. The forecast's reliance on steady ETF inflows makes weekly flow data a key signal, especially after last week's sharp slowdown. The differing upside targets favour bitcoin over ether, which could shift relative positioning between the two after ether's outperformance. Macro remains the swing factor, with dollar strength or a further rise in Treasury yields the main threats to the bank's outlook.---Earlier:A year after its $126,000 peak, bitcoin trades like a rates bet, not an inflation hedge---Citi has turned more bullish on crypto, but its bet is on bitcoin rather than ether, the token that has done most of the running lately.Summary:Citi raised its 12-month bitcoin target to $113,000 from $82,000 and ether to $3,028 from $2,240, Reuters reported.The bank cites stronger crypto activity, a supportive macro backdrop and resuming ETF inflows, with about $5 billion of inflows expected over 12 months.Citi said the Clarity Act's failure in the Senate narrowed the path to legislation, but SEC rule announcements eased sentiment.Bitcoin has gained nearly 40% and ether about 68% over three months, trimming their year-to-date losses to about 4% and 9%.The targets imply about 31% upside for bitcoin against about 11% for ether.Citigroup has raised its 12-month price forecasts for bitcoin and ether, pointing to stronger activity in crypto markets, a supportive macro backdrop and a return of inflows into exchange-traded funds.In a note late last week, the bank lifted its bitcoin target to $113,000 from $82,000 and its ether forecast to $3,028 from $2,240, Reuters reported. Citi expects inflows into crypto to resume at a slower but steadier pace as financial advisers and brokerages gradually build allocations to bitcoin, and it forecasts around $5 billion of inflows over the next year.The upgrade comes despite a regulatory setback. The US Senate failed to advance the Clarity Act, legislation intended to create a framework for digital asset markets. Citi said the bill's failure narrowed the path to market-structure legislation but prompted rule announcements from the Securities and Exchange Commission that helped ease negative sentiment.Crypto prices have rebounded strongly in recent months. Bitcoin has risen nearly 40% over the past three months and ether about 68%, cutting their losses for the year to roughly 4% and 9% respectively. Bitcoin's recovery from its July lows has been helped by a softer dollar following the US Treasury's move to buy back longer-dated bonds, according to Reuters.The forecasts imply a notable gap between the two largest tokens. With bitcoin trading around $86,000 and ether near $2,700 when the targets were published, Citi's numbers point to upside of about 31% for bitcoin but only about 11% for ether, despite ether's stronger performance in recent months. One analysis of the note suggested that ether's sharp rally has already captured much of its near-term upside, while bitcoin is better placed to benefit first from new institutional inflows.The outlook still depends heavily on the broader macro picture. Citi cited a supportive backdrop, but some other banks see the dollar strengthening from here, which could weigh on crypto. With US Treasury yields near multi-decade highs, investors are also demanding more from assets that pay no income, raising the bar for the steady ETF flows that underpin Citi's forecast. This article was written by Eamonn Sheridan at investinglive.com.

  • Connecting the dots: How France’s budget problems are turning into the euro’s problem
    by Justin Low on October 6, 2026 at 8:54 am

    In looking at the EUR/USD chart yesterday, it would be easy to write off the drop below 1.1200 as being simply another story about a stronger dollar. However, the euro's slide to a 17-month low around 1.1160 also tells us something about what is happening much closer to home.Quite simply, France's budget problems are starting to become the euro's problem too.Now, the concern itself is relatively straightforward. For years, France has been struggling to convince investors that it can meaningfully bring its budget deficit under control - particularly with a divided political backdrop, which makes fiscal tightening even harder to deliver. And that uncertainty has been showing up most clearly in the bond market.Investors are currently demanding a bigger premium to hold French government debt over the much safer German bunds, pushing the French-German 10-year yield spread sharply wider. And this is where the story starts to move beyond France itself.As the chart shows, EUR/USD fell sharply in early trading yesterday before recovering some ground. The drop saw the pair briefly touch its weakest level since May 2025.But you might ask, why should problems with France's budget matter for the euro?That is because markets aren't just asking the question of whether France can fix its finances anymore. They are also asking whether rising French borrowing costs could spill over into other parts of the euro area.If that were to happen, then this stops being a purely French risk story and starts becoming one about euro area fragmentation risk.Just think of it as a chain reaction. To start, French fiscal concerns push French bond yields higher. Then, wider spreads will raise questions over whether that pressure could spread to countries such as Italy or Belgium. That in turn makes European assets less attractive at the margin and adds a fundamental reason for investors to reduce their exposure to the euro.Besides that, there is the ECB angle in looking at this as well.If higher borrowing costs lead to tighter financial conditions and begin weighing on growth, the central bank may have less room to keep raising interest rates. And that becomes even more relevant when US Treasury yields remain elevated on the other side of EUR/USD, continuing to offer support to the dollar. It is a double whammy of sorts with more pressure on the euro at home, while higher yields in the US provide a tailwind for the dollar on the other side of the trade.Now, I wouldn't say that France alone is what caused the euro selloff yesterday. Dollar strength and elevated Treasury yields clearly played their part too. But in falling to a 17-month low, I would argue that French fiscal risk can no longer be treated as an isolated story confined to the bond market. If and when French spreads continue to widen, the euro is going to become one of the clearest places where that stress shows up. This article was written by Justin Low at investinglive.com.

  • Market breadth divergence: What it tells traders about the stock market
    by Giuseppe Dellamotta on October 6, 2026 at 7:31 am

    Last week, fewer than 25% of S&P 500's constituents were trading above their 50-day moving averages and fewer than 45% above their 200-day moving averages. According to analysts, this represents the weakest breadth ever recorded, suggesting that mega-cap stocks are masking significant weakness underneath the surface.Historically, similar divergences have been relatively rare and have sometimes appeared before major market peaks, including in 2014 and 2021. However, breadth divergence is not a timing signal by itself.When the S&P 500 rises, the natural assumption is that the stock market is broadly getting stronger. But an index can rise even when a large portion of its constituents are falling. This is particularly important for capitalization-weighted indices such as the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq, where the largest companies have a disproportionately large influence on the index.Market breadth measures how broadly a market move is distributed among its individual stocks. A market rally supported by hundreds of stocks is fundamentally different from a rally driven by only a handful of large companies. What is market breadth?The simplest measure of breadth is the number of advancing stocks versus declining stocks. For example, imagine that the S&P 500 rises 0.8% on a particular day. If 400 stocks rise and only 100 fall, the rally has strong breadth. Many stocks are participating. But suppose the S&P 500 rises 0.8% while only 150 stocks rise and 350 decline. The index is still going up, but the participation is much weaker.One commonly used indicator is the advance/decline (A/D) line. Each day, the number of declining stocks is subtracted from the number of advancing stocks, and the result is accumulated over time. A rising A/D line therefore means that participation is broadly improving, while a falling A/D line indicates that fewer stocks are participating in the upside. Another popular measure is the percentage of stocks trading above their 50-day or 200-day moving average.Chart: S&P 500 (CFD contract) and A/D line indicator (Advance-Decline Line by Nepo123 on TradingView)What is a breadth divergence?A positive breadth divergence occurs when the index is falling or making new lows while breadth is improving. For example, the S&P 500 might be going down, while the A/D line rises. This tells traders that although the headline index remains weak, more stocks are beginning to participate on the upside. It can be an early indication that selling pressure is losing strength.A negative breadth divergence is the opposite, the S&P 500 might be making new highs, while the A/D line declines. The index is still rising, but fewer stocks are supporting the move.This does not automatically mean that the market is about to fall. It means that the rally is becoming increasingly concentrated and therefore potentially more vulnerable if the stocks driving the index higher begin to weaken or there's a negative catalyst. How traders can use breadthBreadth is best used as a confirmation tool, rather than as a timing signal by itself. Suppose the S&P 500 breaks to a new all-time high. If the A/D line also breaks to a new high and the percentage of stocks above their 50-day moving averages is rising, the breakout has broad participation. This gives traders greater confidence that the underlying trend is healthy.If the S&P 500 makes a new high, but the A/D line has been declining for several weeks and fewer stocks are above their 50-day moving averages, the trader should not automatically short the market. Instead, the trader might become less aggressive with new long positions, tighten risk management or pay closer attention to whether the leading stocks begin to weaken.The same concept works in reverse. If the S&P 500 makes a new low, but the A/D line makes a higher high, the market may be showing early internal improvement. Selling is becoming less widespread even though the headline index remains weak. This article was written by Giuseppe Dellamotta at investinglive.com.

[blog count="2" style="modern" columns="1" category="company-news" category_multi="" exclude_id="" more="1" filters="0" pagination="0" load_more="" greyscale="0" margin=""]